This competition has closed. Its entry deadline has passed; this piece is kept for reference. For competitions open right now, see the summer deadline calendar → or browse what’s open today →.
The HIPA jury never sees a meaningful share of photographs submitted to the contest. Those frames are removed by HIPA’s pre-screening committee — a separate group from the editorial jury, charged with reading every entry against the rules text before any aesthetic judgement begins. The dominant reasons for removal are not weak concept, soft focus, or wrong category. They are clauses 7 and 8 of the 2026 rules: the authenticity clause and the AI-generation clause.
With the 2026 Family window closing 23:59 UAE time on 31 May — roughly twenty-nine hours from this column — the most useful question a late-cycle submitter can ask is not is my photograph strong enough. It is does my photograph survive the rules.
This column reads HIPA’s own language on what’s allowed in the photographic categories, and what is not.
The two clauses, in HIPA’s own words
The 2026 rules separate the question into two clauses. The first governs post-processing:
“Basic technical editing of the Photo(s) is acceptable, provided any such editing does not affect the authenticity and/or genuineness of the Photo(s). Advanced editing used to create illusions, deceptions and/or manipulations; including compositing and creative retouching of the Photo(s) prohibited.”
The second governs artificial intelligence:
“Participants are required to submit a written declaration confirming that no artificial intelligence tools or software were used in the creation of submitted works in categories where such technologies are not permitted.”
Two clauses, both binary. A photograph is either compliant or it is not. There is no partial-credit lane.
What “basic technical editing” actually covers
HIPA does not publish an exhaustive list, but every public ruling from past cycles — and every Q&A response surfaced on the foundation’s social channels — has confirmed the same operational set. The following edits are permitted on photographs entered into Family:
| Edit | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Crop | Allowed | Aspect ratio change permitted; recomposition that adds elements is not |
| Exposure correction | Allowed | Including selective dodge-and-burn that does not create or remove an object |
| White balance correction | Allowed | Including selective WB on portions of the frame |
| Noise reduction | Allowed | Including selective NR; AI-trained NR (Topaz DeNoise, DxO DeepPRIME) is permitted |
| Sharpening | Allowed | Including AI-trained sharpening (Topaz Sharpen AI, equivalent) |
| Lens-distortion correction | Allowed | Including perspective correction for architectural frames |
| Sensor-dust removal | Allowed | Single-pixel cleanup that does not affect subject |
| Conversion to monochrome | Allowed | Family has no colour-or-black-and-white restriction |
The principle threading all eight: the edit is a correction of how the camera recorded the scene, not a change to what was in the scene. A noise-reduction pass cleans up high-ISO grain. A white-balance shift compensates for the colour temperature the camera assumed. Neither adds, removes, or substitutes a visual element. Both survive the authenticity clause.
What disqualifies the photograph
Three categories of edit cross the line. Each is unambiguous in past HIPA rulings.
Compositing and frame-merging. Any photograph assembled from more than one shutter release. Sky replacement falls here — a photograph where the original sky was substituted with a sky from a different exposure, a different day, or a stock library is no longer a single capture. HDR stacks where multiple exposures of the same scene are merged are a contested case; HIPA has accepted exposure bracketing only when the bracket captures the same instant. Time-blended frames, focus stacks, panorama stitches — all disqualified in Family.
Generative AI. Any edit produced by a generative model. The most common 2026 failures: Photoshop’s Generative Fill (extending a sky, removing a passerby, cleaning a background) and Adobe’s Generative Remove. Both leave statistical signatures in the file’s pixel metadata that HIPA’s pre-screening process can detect. Less obviously: Lightroom’s Denoise feature is permitted (it is a noise-reduction model, not a generative one), but Lightroom’s Generative Remove is not. The distinction is whether the model invents pixels or restores them.
Creative retouching beyond basic correction. Removing a person from the frame, even by traditional clone-stamping. Substituting one face for another. Adding a flock of birds. Painting in an object. None of these survives clause 8 even when no AI tool was used. The clause governs intent — create illusions, deceptions and/or manipulations — not the technology behind the edit.
The portrait sub-clause and the caption
The Family category accepts both single-subject and group-subject frames. For single-subject portraits, the 2026 rules require a written caption of minimum 150 words attesting to the relationship between photographer and subject. The caption is not a marketing space — it is a compliance document. False statements about how a photograph was made, or about the relationship between the photographer and the subject, are themselves grounds for disqualification under clause 4.
The pragmatic reading: write the caption as you would write a deposition. Place. Date. Subject’s relationship to you. How access was arranged. What was photographed. Nothing speculative, nothing editorial, nothing that cannot be confirmed if the foundation asks.
The Dreams Through AI track
A photographer whose practice lives in the generative register has a category to submit into. The Dreams Through AI track explicitly accepts work “based on an original source photo captured by, or legally owned by, the participant, which has been further developed or transformed using artificial intelligence techniques.”
The track is distinct from Family. A generative-AI photograph submitted into Family will be disqualified. The same photograph, submitted into Dreams Through AI, is on-rules. For photographers uncertain which side of the line their frame falls on, the operational answer is to enter the AI track rather than risk a Family-track disqualification.
The two tracks are mutually exclusive per photograph. A single frame cannot be submitted to both. The choice is made at submission and is irrevocable.
What HIPA’s pre-screening actually checks
The pre-screening committee runs a layered process. The first pass is metadata: EXIF read for software fields (a Photoshop file with “Generative Fill” in the layer history fails immediately), capture-time consistency across the bracket if HDR is declared, GPS fields if location is part of the declaration. The second pass is forensic: error-level analysis on JPEG re-saves, statistical signature detection on the noise floor, manual review for compositing artefacts at high zoom. The third pass is contextual: comparison against published archives, reverse-image search, prior-submission databases.
The first pass alone removes the largest share of disqualified entries. The remediation is at the photographer’s end: export from RAW to JPEG with a clean software field, no edit-history baked into the file, EXIF fields preserved from the original capture.
The declaration
At submission, HIPA requires a written declaration attesting to the authenticity of every entered photograph. The declaration is a single checkbox in the submission portal accompanied by the photographer’s name. It is a legal attestation. A false declaration is grounds for permanent ban from the foundation’s awards under clause 11.
The declaration is short. The consequence is not.
The day’s read
For the photographer choosing a frame on Saturday 30 May to submit by Sunday evening UAE time:
- Re-export from RAW. Open the original capture in your editor, apply only the operations listed in the allowed column above, export to JPEG with EXIF preserved. A clean export with no edit history is the simplest defence against the first pre-screening pass.
- Run the file through a metadata reader. ExifTool on the command line, or Phil Harvey’s online viewer, will show every field HIPA’s screen sees. Confirm no generative-tool strings remain. Confirm capture date, lens, camera body, GPS if present are intact and consistent.
- If the frame is borderline, switch tracks. A photograph that crossed the line during editing — even unintentionally — is safer submitted to Dreams Through AI than rejected from Family. The prize structure is different but the photograph survives.
- Submit Saturday, not Sunday. The portal slows under deadline-day load. A Saturday submission lands cleanly and leaves Sunday as an overnight window if the photographer changes their mind.
The strongest concept in any photographer’s archive is meaningless if the file does not survive the first pre-screening pass. The reverse is also true: a moderate-concept frame that survives the rules will be read by the editorial jury. A strong-concept frame disqualified in week one will not.
— The Critic
HIPA Family 2026 submissions close 23:59 UAE time on 31 May 2026. Full rules at hipa.ae/en/rules-and-regulations.